Home / Arkansas / The Reaper Haunted House

The Reaper Haunted House

North Little Rock, AR · Seasonal
SeasonalHaunted House

The Reaper Haunted House is a seasonal haunted attraction in North Little Rock, AR. Directory listing: 4.4★ from 275 ratings. Phone: (501) 400-3116. Official website: arreaper.com.

Homepage snapshot of The Reaper Haunted House
Address7200 Lunn Rd, North Little Rock, AR 72118
Rating4.4★ aggregate · 275 ratings (directory ingest)

About

The Reaper Haunted House is listed as a seasonal in North Little Rock, AR. Details are limited in the current dataset; check the official website when available.

What to expect (from guest feedback)

Based on 275 reviews we analyzed (Google listing total 275); highlighting last-season themes (20 recent / 166 older). Source mix: google 186. Synthesized from reviews — not republished Google or other platform text.

Recent-season takeaway

From the last haunt season through now (20 of 275 analyzed reviews), last-season praise still clusters around worth the ticket and return tradition / recommend. Recent friction themes lean toward touch / aggression concerns and waits & lines. Counts are theme mentions we classified — not republished guest wording.

Overall pattern

Across the full sample, guests most often celebrate worth the ticket, return tradition / recommend, scare quality & intensity. The most common complaint clusters are waits & lines, price / value complaints, touch / aggression concerns. Use the tips below for planning; scoreboard bars remain secondary sort signals.

People loved

Worth the ticket often · 48 mentions recent 7 / older 41

A solid share of reviewers say the night feels worth the ticket when both houses and midway are factored in.

  • Speed / VIP pass upsell (2) — Speed or VIP-style passes are frequently mentioned as the way around long general lines — and as a costly add-on.

sources: google:48

Return tradition / recommend sometimes · 30 mentions recent 2 / older 28

Repeat visits and strong recommend language are common — many treat it as a yearly Atlanta-area ritual.

  • Best-in-area reputation (17) — Best-haunt / favorite-haunt framing is common among high-rating guests.
  • Yearly return habit (4) — Many locals describe an every-year return habit.

sources: google:30

Scare quality & intensity sometimes · 23 mentions recent 0 / older 23

Many guests describe the scares as intense and effective, not just mild decoration.

  • Named creature tropes (clowns, zombies, etc.) (4) — Classic creature tropes (clowns, zombies, and similar) get specific shout-outs inside the houses.
  • Jump-scare style (2) — Jump-scare style is a specific craft debate — loved when timed well, criticized when overused.

sources: google:23

Actors & performances occasionally · 8 mentions recent 2 / older 6

Guests frequently praise energetic scare actors who stay in character and sell the scenes.

  • Makeup, costumes & creature design (6) — Creature makeup and costumes are a frequent specific praise point.
  • Named creature tropes (clowns, zombies, etc.) (4) — Classic creature tropes (clowns, zombies, and similar) get specific shout-outs inside the houses.

sources: google:8

Sets, props & effects occasionally · 7 mentions recent 1 / older 6

Production detail — sets, props, and animatronics — comes up as a standout reason people return.

  • Makeup, costumes & creature design (6) — Creature makeup and costumes are a frequent specific praise point.

sources: google:7

Common complaints

Waits & lines occasionally · 12 mentions recent 0 / older 12

Long queues — especially peak weekend nights — are the most common friction theme.

  • Weekend vs weekday crowds (4) — Friday/Saturday crowds and waits are contrasted with quieter weeknights in planning advice.
  • Speed / VIP pass upsell (2) — Speed or VIP-style passes are frequently mentioned as the way around long general lines — and as a costly add-on.

sources: google:12

Price / value complaints occasionally · 6 mentions recent 0 / older 6

Some guests feel ticket or add-on pricing outpaces what they got, especially after long waits.

  • Speed / VIP pass upsell (2) — Speed or VIP-style passes are frequently mentioned as the way around long general lines — and as a costly add-on.

sources: google:6

Touch / aggression concerns rarely · 4 mentions recent 1 / older 3

Touch policy comes up both ways — venue markets no deliberate touch, but a few guests still report contact concerns.

  • Touch / no-touch expectations (7) — Touch expectations matter to some guests; official posture is no deliberate actor touch.

sources: google:4

Specific things guests keep mentioning
  • Best-in-area reputation (17 · sometimes) — Best-haunt / favorite-haunt framing is common among high-rating guests.
  • Kids & age fit (12 · occasionally) — Age fit for kids is debated — some families enjoy it; others say leave younger kids home.
  • Touch / no-touch expectations (7 · occasionally) — Touch expectations matter to some guests; official posture is no deliberate actor touch.
  • Makeup, costumes & creature design (6 · occasionally) — Creature makeup and costumes are a frequent specific praise point.

Tips from guest patterns

Actionable planning notes supported by multiple mentions. Confidence is mention-volume only — not a guarantee.

  • Expect a no-deliberate-touch actor policy; still set group expectations if anyone is contact-sensitive. emerging confidence · 7 supporting mentions
  • Check the minimum age and your kids' scare tolerance — family fit feedback splits by age. emerging confidence · 6 supporting mentions
Scoreboard (sortable signals)

HH-derived aspect scores for compare & sort. Subjective bars are 1–5; family/return show yes-rate %. Higher wait score = shorter wait.

Worth it
4.3
Scare intensity
4.7
Scare quality
4.7
Wait length
1.5
Sets & effects
4.2
Actors
5.0
Experience length
2.0
Ops & parking
4.0
Would return / recommend
87%

Tags

Haunted House

Related

Sources

  • Serper Google Maps (serper:placeId:ChIJM9h-1Oyi0ocRPV2AYzIgSlk) · 2026-09-06
  • HH What-to-expect clusters + tips · 275 reviews analyzed · as of 2026-09-11 (synthesized; no platform review text republished)
  • Directory last verified: 2026-09-06

Page built 2026-09-20 16:35 UTC. Homepage JPEG: ApiFlash capture when available. NAP from directory ingest. No verbatim Google review text. Last verified: 2026-09-06.