Home / Georgia / Camp Blood

Camp Blood

Carrollton, GA · Seasonal
SeasonalHaunted House

Camp Blood is a seasonal haunted attraction in Carrollton, GA. Directory listing: 4.6★ from 258 ratings. Phone: +1 770-854-2267. Official website: campblood.com.

Homepage snapshot of Camp Blood
Address2277 Whooping Creek Rd, Carrollton, GA 30116, United States
Rating4.6★ aggregate · 258 ratings (directory ingest)

About

Camp Blood is listed as a seasonal in Carrollton, GA. Details are limited in the current dataset; check the official website when available.

What to expect (from guest feedback)

Based on 258 reviews we analyzed (Google listing total 258); highlighting last-season themes (14 recent / 172 older). Source mix: google 186. Synthesized from reviews — not republished Google or other platform text.

Recent-season takeaway

From the last haunt season through now (14 of 258 analyzed reviews), last-season praise still clusters around return tradition / recommend and worth the ticket. Recent friction themes lean toward not scary enough. Counts are theme mentions we classified — not republished guest wording.

Overall pattern

Across the full sample, guests most often celebrate return tradition / recommend, worth the ticket, scare quality & intensity. The most common complaint clusters are not scary enough. Use the tips below for planning; scoreboard bars remain secondary sort signals.

People loved

Return tradition / recommend often · 39 mentions recent 2 / older 37

Repeat visits and strong recommend language are common — many treat it as a yearly Atlanta-area ritual.

  • Yearly return habit (9) — Many locals describe an every-year return habit.
  • Best-in-area reputation (9) — Best-haunt / favorite-haunt framing is common among high-rating guests.

sources: google:39

Worth the ticket sometimes · 16 mentions recent 0 / older 16

A solid share of reviewers say the night feels worth the ticket when both houses and midway are factored in.

  • Speed / VIP pass upsell (2) — Speed or VIP-style passes are frequently mentioned as the way around long general lines — and as a costly add-on.

sources: google:16

Scare quality & intensity sometimes · 15 mentions recent 0 / older 15

Many guests describe the scares as intense and effective, not just mild decoration.

  • Jump-scare style (8) — Jump-scare style is a specific craft debate — loved when timed well, criticized when overused.
  • Named creature tropes (clowns, zombies, etc.) (6) — Classic creature tropes (clowns, zombies, and similar) get specific shout-outs inside the houses.

sources: google:15

Actors & performances occasionally · 6 mentions recent 0 / older 6

Guests frequently praise energetic scare actors who stay in character and sell the scenes.

  • Named creature tropes (clowns, zombies, etc.) (6) — Classic creature tropes (clowns, zombies, and similar) get specific shout-outs inside the houses.
  • Makeup, costumes & creature design (2) — Creature makeup and costumes are a frequent specific praise point.

sources: google:6

Immersion & atmosphere occasionally · 6 mentions recent 0 / older 6

Atmosphere and immersion are recurring praise points — guests feel dropped into a crafted world.

sources: google:6

Parking & ops (positive) rarely · 2 mentions recent 0 / older 2

When ops go well, guests call out free/nearby parking and organized staff.

  • Off-site / lot parking logistics (5) — Parking across the street / nearby lots is a recurring logistics note — usually free but can confuse first-timers.

sources: google:2

Family / kids fit (positive) rarely · 2 mentions recent 0 / older 2

Some families report an enjoyable night together, though intensity varies by age and house.

  • Kids & age fit (23) — Age fit for kids is debated — some families enjoy it; others say leave younger kids home.

sources: google:2

Common complaints

Not scary enough rarely · 4 mentions recent 1 / older 3

A minority say the scare payoff felt mild or jump-scare heavy relative to hype and price.

  • Jump-scare style (8) — Jump-scare style is a specific craft debate — loved when timed well, criticized when overused.

sources: google:4

Specific things guests keep mentioning
  • Kids & age fit (23 · sometimes) — Age fit for kids is debated — some families enjoy it; others say leave younger kids home.
  • Yearly return habit (9 · occasionally) — Many locals describe an every-year return habit.
  • Best-in-area reputation (9 · occasionally) — Best-haunt / favorite-haunt framing is common among high-rating guests.
  • Jump-scare style (8 · occasionally) — Jump-scare style is a specific craft debate — loved when timed well, criticized when overused.
  • Named creature tropes (clowns, zombies, etc.) (6 · occasionally) — Classic creature tropes (clowns, zombies, and similar) get specific shout-outs inside the houses.
  • Weekend vs weekday crowds (6 · occasionally) — Friday/Saturday crowds and waits are contrasted with quieter weeknights in planning advice.
  • Off-site / lot parking logistics (5 · occasionally) — Parking across the street / nearby lots is a recurring logistics note — usually free but can confuse first-timers.

Tips from guest patterns

Actionable planning notes supported by multiple mentions. Confidence is mention-volume only — not a guarantee.

  • Check the minimum age and your kids' scare tolerance — family fit feedback splits by age. medium confidence · 15 supporting mentions
Scoreboard (sortable signals)

HH-derived aspect scores for compare & sort. Subjective bars are 1–5; family/return show yes-rate %. Higher wait score = shorter wait.

Worth it
4.5
Scare intensity
3.5
Scare quality
4.3
Kids / family fit
100%
Wait length
1.3
Actors
4.3
Experience length
1.0
Ops & parking
4.0
Immersion / atmosphere
4.2
Would return / recommend
91%

Tags

Haunted House

Related

Sources

  • Serper Google Maps (serper:placeId:ChIJae6W_8Axi4gRBzoY7glJw1o) · 2026-09-06
  • HH What-to-expect clusters + tips · 258 reviews analyzed · as of 2026-09-11 (synthesized; no platform review text republished)
  • Directory last verified: 2026-09-06

Page built 2026-09-20 16:35 UTC. Homepage JPEG: ApiFlash capture when available. NAP from directory ingest. No verbatim Google review text. Last verified: 2026-09-06.